Navigation
Download the AMN app for your mobile device today - FREE!

Judge rules US must fund transgender surgeries for military members, blocks Trump’s ban

President Donald Trump (Chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff/Flickr)
November 21, 2017
113K Shares

A federal district court judge in Maryland ruled Tuesday that the U.S. must continue to fund sex-reassignment surgeries for transgender service members in the military, citing that they have “already suffered harmful consequences,” after President Donald Trump called for a transgender ban in the military.

The Trump Administration can’t deny funding for certain medical care for transgender service members, said District Judge Marvin Garbis, The Washington Post reported.

“In his 53-page order, Garbis said the transgender service members challenging the ban have ‘demonstrated that they are already suffering harmful consequences such as the cancellation and postponements of surgeries, the stigma of being set apart as inherently unfit, facing the prospect of discharge and inability to commission as an officer, the inability to move forward with long-term medical plans, and the threat to their prospects of obtaining long-term assignments,'” The Post reported.

In October, another U.S. district court judge ruled that there can be no changes to the U.S. Military’s transgender policy while there is a pending case against the proposed ban that is being reviewed in court. That judge, Colleen Kollar-Kotelly, had denied a motion to block the ban on gender reassignment funds.

President Donald Trump in August signed a directive that instructed the Pentagon to prohibit transgender people from joining the military, and it gave Defense Secretary Jim Mattis the power to remove any transgender service member based on deployability.

The new directive was also to end payments for gender reassignment surgeries for those in the military, as well as other medical treatments for gender transitioning.

Kollar-Kotelly had held that the plaintiffs “have established that they will be injured by these directives, due both to the inherent inequality they impose, and the risk of discharge and denial of accession that they engender,” CNN reported.

The U.S. government had argued that the lawsuit was “premature,” CNN reported, and to dismiss the case.

On July 26, Trump announced the ban in three tweets that seemingly blindsided officials and outraged many people.

“After consultation with my Generals and military experts, please be advised that the United States Government will not accept or allow Transgender individuals to serve in any capacity in the U.S. Military,” Trump had tweeted.

“Our military must be focused on decisive and overwhelming victory and cannot be burdened with the tremendous medical costs and disruption that transgender in the military would entail,” he said.

Mattis reportedly had six months from August – which would put the end date sometime in or around February – to prepare to implement the White House’s directive.

After the President’s directive was released, Mattis in August said that transgender troops will continue to serve in the U.S. military, pending the results of a study from experts Mattis will select who will provide advice on Trump’s recent memorandum.

The American Civil Liberties Union (ACLU) in August announced it was suing President Trump over his transgender ban for the U.S. military.

 

 

113K Shares