This article was originally published by Radio Free Asia and is reprinted with permission.
Chinese public security entities have been acquiring U.S. technology with the transfers becoming increasingly regular, especially of DNA analysis equipment needed for mass surveillance, a new report has found.
“The Role of US Technology in China’s Public Security System” by the U.S. intelligence and security research group Recorded Future revealed the sweeping extent of technology transfers from U.S. companies to Chinese companies to be used by the public security apparatus, including in the Xinjiang Uyghur Autonomous Region.
From DNA analysis to thermal imaging, from data storage to digital forensics and cyber security, a vast range of U.S. technology has been transferred to the Chinese public security system.
Surveillance and counter-surveillance are among the main focuses of the technology transfers, the report said.
“In some cases, public security entities in China almost certainly seek technology from U.S. companies because foreign products outperform domestic equivalents,” it said.
In other cases, the technology was acquired “to ensure compatibility” as it had already been used by Chinese organizations.
According to the report, public security entities in the Xinjiang Uyghur Autonomous Region “appear to have purchased at least 481 hard disk drives from Seagate and Western Digital” in early-to-mid 2022, including surveillance-specialized drives and drives acquired alongside equipment from China’s leading surveillance providers.
Both Seagate Technology Holdings and Western Digital Corporation are well-known American data storage companies.
“Other entities in Xinjiang, such as prisons belonging to the paramilitary Xinjiang Production and Construction Corps, have also recently carried out surveillance-oriented purchases of Seagate or Western Digital hard disk drives,” it said.
Another report released last year also said U.S. technology companies were supplying China’s surveillance state with equipment and software for monitoring populations and censoring information, including in Xinjiang.
Western governments and human rights groups have condemned Beijing for surveillance and other abusive policies against the 12 million Muslim Uyghurs in the region, which they said amounted to genocide and crimes against humanity. China has repeatedly denied the allegations.
‘Extremely common transfers’
“When I started the research, I did not expect these technology transfers to be so prevalent,” said report author Zoe Haver.
She began the project by looking at transfers of counter-surveillance devices used by the U.S. military and U.S. law enforcement, but during the process she found that Chinese public security entities were purchasing U.S. technology for use in many other areas, such as aviation, DNA analysis, thermal imaging, optics, surveillance, cybersecurity, network infrastructure, and data storage.
“With some of the technologies that I was tracking, such as DNA analysis equipment, I observed new purchases on pretty much a day-to-day basis. These transfers are extremely common across China,” she told RFA.
The Chinese public security apparatus has been seeking DNA analysis equipment, with the reliance on U.S. technology in this area “most notable,” according to the analyst.
“This equipment can potentially be used to help build population databases and carry out mass surveillance,” Haver said.
Entities belonging to the powerful Ministry of Public Security (MPS) have been acquiring U.S. technology via legal channels at industry exhibitions, third-party agents and distributors, and even from U.S. companies’ local subsidiaries in China.
Recently more and more U.S. firms have been bought by Chinese companies and this has “aided the growth of China’s domestic industries and facilitated sales of U.S. products to public security end users,” according to the report.
Another factor is the cross-border flows of talent that have become increasingly common in the era of globalization.
U.S. control response
Haver compiled the report by sifting through thousands of public Chinese government procurement records and she said that she was struck by the sheer number of procurement documents.
In response to the state violence that Chinese public security entities carry out, particularly in Xinjiang, the U.S. government has taken some steps in recent years to restrict the transfer of U.S. technology to them.
The Export Control Reform Act of 2018 referred to items that have law enforcement-related applications and stipulated that “the U.S. export control policy should serve to protect human rights.”
In 2019 and 2020, the U.S. Department of Commerce Bureau of Industry and Security placed 21 Chinese public security entities (in addition to various Chinese companies) on an export licensing restrictions list.
But Recorded Future report raised the question of “the efficacy of current U.S. export control measures that target Chinese public security entities and the Chinese companies that support them.”
“As third-party distributors and agents play such a prominent role in the technology transfer process, the U.S. government may find it difficult to implement effective export restrictions,” Haver told RFA.
