A 20-year-old sailor will face a military trial on charges he deliberately set the fire that destroyed a $1.2 billion warship on the San Diego waterfront in 2020, the Navy announced Friday.
Seaman Recruit Ryan Sawyer Mays, a former deck seaman on the amphibious assault ship Bonhomme Richard, is charged with aggravated arson and the willful hazarding of a vessel in connection with the four-day fire that destroyed most of the ship. Vice Adm. Steve Koehler, the commander of the San Diego-based U.S. 3rd Fleet, issued the order to send the case to trial on Wednesday, according to court documents.
“After careful review of the preliminary hearing report, (Koehler) referred charges” against Mays, said Cmdr. Sean Robertson, a 3rd Fleet spokesperson. “Charges were brought in response to evidence found during the criminal investigation into the fire that started on the former USS Bonhomme Richard (LHD 6) on July 12, 2020.”
Mays was notified Friday, said Gary Barthel, Mays’ San Diego-based civilian lawyer. Mays denies the charges against him, Barthel told the Union-Tribune in an interview.
“He maintains his innocence — always has,” Barthel said when reached by phone Friday. “He’s not happy to be going to court-martial but he’s determined to prove his innocence.”
The notification of trial came as a surprise to Mays, Barthel said, because a military judge recommended against proceeding to trial.
At a preliminary Article 32 hearing at Naval Base San Diego in December, Navy prosecutors made their case against Mays in front of a hearing officer, Capt. Angela Tang, a Navy judge. During the three-day hearing, witnesses for both the prosecution and defense testified about the fire and about comments Mays allegedly made in the days and weeks afterward.
In the military justice system, Article 32 hearings fill the role that a grand jury does in the civilian system, except that just one person — in this case, Tang — weighs the evidence and testimony and recommends whether there is enough to proceed to trial, or court-martial.
In that preliminary hearing, Navy prosecutors only needed to prove they had probable cause to send Mays to trial. At trial, just as in the civilian system, that evidentiary standard is elevated to the stricter “beyond a reasonable doubt.”
According to Barthel, Tang’s report recommended against going to trial over concerns about the evidence.
“She put a lot of time and consideration into her report,” Barthel said. “She was meticulous at the preliminary hearing and considered the evidence. She not only listened to witnesses but took time to question them. Her recommendation to the Navy was that the case not refer to trial based on issues with evidence.”
In the military system, legal matters fall under a single “convening authority” who makes the final decisions on whether to send a case to trial and even whether a guilty verdict is upheld. In this case, that authority is the 3rd Fleet admiral, Koehler.
Koehler’s spokesperson declined to comment on Tang’s recommendation and, citing the integrity of the legal process, declined to comment on Barthel’s assertion that she was concerned about the strength of the evidence against Mays. Both the Navy and Barthel also declined to provide the Union-Tribune with a copy of Tang’s report. Robertson, Koehler’s spokesperson, said only that the admiral’s decision came after “thoroughly reviewing the entirety of the hearing officer’s report.”
Barthel also pointed out that Mays’ rank as provided by the Navy in his biographical data sheet — seaman recruit, or E-1 — differed with the one on his charge sheet, which still reflected seaman apprentice, or E-2. Mays’ rank was the subject of confusion during his December hearing as the Navy said he was an E-2 but he appeared in court with the rank insignia of a seaman, or E-3.
Prosecutors told Tang at the time that by showing up to his own hearing in the wrong uniform was an example of Mays’ attitude toward the Navy. They also said Mays had recently tested positive for drugs on a recent urinalysis, although they were not charging him with the offense.
According to his Navy biography, Mays was reduced to his current rank on January 11. Barthel declined to comment on whether Mays was reduced in rank as a result of non-judicial punishment, an administrative measure military commanders may take outside the military court system.
Sailors first reported seeing smoke on board the Bonhomme Richard — whose primary mission was to transport Marines and deliver them to a beachhead in amphibious vehicles and aircraft — just after 8 a.m. on Sunday, July 12, 2020, near the ramp down to its lower vehicle storage area, or “lower V.” The ship was nearing the end of an almost two-year, $250 million upgrade to accommodate Marine Corps F-35B fighters. A Navy investigation found the ship and its crew ill-prepared to battle the blaze, with sailors slow to respond and shipboard fire stations missing equipment or out of commission that morning.
Two hours passed before firefighters from San Diego Fire-Rescue Department first put water on the flames. By then, it was too late, and the ship burned more than four days before the fire was extinguished. Everything from the waterline up was destroyed. In December 2020, citing potential repair costs, announced the 22-year-old ship would be scrapped.
It was decommissioned and towed out of San Diego in April.
At Mays’ Article 32 hearing, an arson investigator from the Bureau of Alcohol, Tobacco, Firearms and Explosives said the fire was deliberately set in the ship’s lower V. A sailor on watch at the top of the ramp into the lower V testified he saw Mays — and only Mays — walking down the ramp carrying a bucket just before the fire started.
Prosecutors allege Mays was disgruntled working as a deck seaman on the ship. He joined the Navy in May 2019 to become a SEAL but quit the notoriously demanding Basic Underwater Demolition/SEAL course soon after he started it in September of that year. He reported on board the Bonhomme Richard in March 2020 to the vessel’s deck department.
The sailor on watch the morning of the fire testified hearing Mays say “I love deck” as he passed.
Dozens of Navy officers along with Navy civilian employees were named in the Navy’s investigation into the fire as contributing to the conditions that left the ship vulnerable to fire.
No actions have been announced by the Navy in regard to those cases.
© 2022 The San Diego Union-Tribune
Distributed by Tribune Content Agency, LLC.