Join our brand new verified AMN Telegram channel and get important news uncensored!

Military leaders testify ‘strategic failure’ followed years of mistakes in Afghanistan

Gen. Mark Milley, Chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff, delivers testimony before the Senate Armed Services Committee, Sept. 28, 2021. (YouTube screenshot)

The nation’s top general testified Tuesday that the American war in Afghanistan ended in “strategic failure,” a grim conclusion that acknowledged a long series of mistakes and miscalculations by the Pentagon’s leaders.

“The enemy is in charge in Kabul,” Chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff Gen. Mark A. Milley said during a Senate Armed Services Committee hearing. “There’s no other way to describe that.”

The hearing, which also featured Defense Secretary Lloyd J. Austin III and Gen. Kenneth F. McKenzie Jr., who oversaw operations in Afghanistan, peeled back layer after layer of misconceptions during the longest war in American history:

U.S. military officials trained Afghan forces to be too dependent on advanced technology; they did not appreciate the extent of corruption among local leaders; and they didn’t anticipate how badly the Afghan government would be demoralized by the U.S. withdrawal. Taken together, the Pentagon’s leaders testified, such errors permitted the Taliban to swoop back into power far faster than U.S. officials had anticipated.

Intelligence reports suggesting the Afghan forces could hold off for longer were “a swing and a miss,” Milley said.

The decision to pull out was originally made by President Donald Trump, whose administration reached an agreement with the Taliban to withdraw U.S. troops by May 1, a little more than three months after he left office.

President Joe Biden decided to move forward with a withdrawal, believing that it was no longer worthwhile to prop up the Afghan government, but he pushed back the deadline to Aug. 31.

Some of the testimony Tuesday undermined Biden’s claims that military leaders did not not recommend leaving some troops in Afghanistan. McKenzie said he supported keeping 2,500 service members in Afghanistan, a recommendation that was made by Gen. Scott Miller, who commanded U.S. forces there until July.

“I was present when that discussion occurred and I am confident that the president heard all the recommendations and listened to them very thoughtfully,” he said.

McKenzie also said it was his belief that pulling out all U.S. troops “would lead inevitably to the collapse of the Afghan military forces and eventually the Afghan government.”

It was an unusually public airing of divisions between the president and military leaders — one that will likely reverberate through Washington as Biden continues to face political fallout over the chaotic and deadly withdrawal from Afghanistan.

White House press secretary Jen Psaki, addressing reporters as the hearing was underway, said “there was a range of viewpoints” presented to Biden during internal debates. She also said it was clear that leaving troops in the country would eventually cause the conflict to escalate, drawing U.S. forces back into fighting with the Taliban.

“The president was just not willing to make that decision,” Psaki said. “He did not think it was in the interests of the American people or the interests of our troops.”

During Tuesday’s hearing, Sen. Jack Reed, D-R.I., chairman of the committee, said lawmakers should resist the “temptation to close the book on Afghanistan and simply move on.”

“We must capture the lessons of the last two decades to ensure that our future counterterrorism efforts in Afghanistan and elsewhere continue to hold violent extremists at bay,” he said.

Such operations in Afghanistan will be much more challenging now that there are no longer U.S. forces on the ground, McKenzie testified. He said the military still has the ability to “look into Afghanistan,” albeit in a more limited way.

“It is very hard to do this,” he said. “It is not impossible to do this.”

A reminder of how hard it can be to develop accurate intelligence came during the U.S. evacuation, which was bloodied by an Islamic State suicide bombing that killed 13 U.S. service members and scores of Afghan civilians. Fearing a second attack, the U.S. launched a drone strike against a car it believed was connected to terrorist operations.

“This time, tragically, we were wrong,” McKenzie testified. Ten civilians, including seven children, were killed.

Sen. James Inhofe, R-Okla., the committee’s ranking member, blamed Biden for the messy pullout.

“He failed to anticipate what all of us knew would happen,” he said. “So in August, we all witnessed the horror of the president’s own making.”

Austin described the flawed operation as ultimately successfully. U.S. officials had expected to evacuate no more than 80,000 people, he said, but 124,000 were flown to safety.

“Was it perfect? Of course not,” Austin said, adding that it nevertheless “exceeded expectations.”

Afghanistan wasn’t the only topic covered during the hearing. Milley defended controversial phone calls with his Chinese counterparts near the end of Trump’s presidency, saying the conversations were part of his responsibility to prevent a potentially deadly misunderstanding between two superpowers.

During the calls, which occurred before and after the November election, Milley assured Gen. Li Zuocheng, the top Chinese commander, that Trump was not planning any surprise attack. The discussions were revealed in “Peril,” a new book from Bob Woodward and Robert Costa.

Trump has suggested that Milley committed treason, and Republicans have said he might have subverted the chain of command.

But Milley testified that his calls with Li were far from secret. He said that he coordinated the discussions with Pentagon leadership and afterward he briefed Secretary of State Michael R. Pompeo and White House chief of staff Mark Meadows.

In addition, Milley testified that he wasn’t undermining Trump because the president had no intention of attacking China. However, he said he was concerned that Chinese intelligence was mistakenly concerned that a strike was in the works.

“My task at that time was to de-escalate,” Milley said. “My message again was consistent — ‘Stay calm, steady and de-escalate. We are not going to attack you.’”

Milley also described a call with House Speaker Nancy Pelosi, D-Calif., that occurred after the Jan. 6 Capitol riot. Pelosi expressed concerns that Trump was unstable, and she worried about his control of the country’s nuclear weapons, according to “Peril.”

The general told lawmakers that he’s not in the “chain of command” for a nuclear strike — he serves as a military adviser, not a commander — but he’s in the “chain of communication.”

During his conversation with Pelosi, Milley testified, he said that “the president is the sole nuclear launch authority, and he doesn’t launch them alone, and I am not qualified to determine the mental health of the president of the United States.”


© 2021 Los Angeles Times
Distributed by Tribune Content Agency, LLC