Navigation
Download the AMN app for your mobile device today - FREE!

Lawmakers call for Army’s Iraq War study to be published

Chief of Staff-Army, Gen. Raymond T. Odierno speaks during a press conference after a military demonstration involving U.S. and Lithuanian forces near, Rukla, Lithuania, July 7, 2015. (Sgt. Jarred Woods/U.S. Army)
696 Shares

A candid history of how the Army prosecuted the Iraq War intended to be published while its lessons were still relevant was completed more than two years ago, but has yet to be released, with former officials saying it became mired in reviews and infighting amid concerns it might make the Army look bad.

Commissioned in 2013 by former chief of staff Gen. Ray Odierno, “The United States Army in the Iraq War” is an unclassified history of more than 1,300 pages charting U.S. involvement in the conflict, which cost more than 4,400 American lives between 2003 and 2011. But few outsiders had heard of the report until last week, when The Wall Street Journal published an account of the secret history.

“We worked tirelessly for three years to complete a scholarly product that captured the war’s lessons in a readable historical narrative,” Frank Sobchak, a retired colonel who was the study team’s final director, told the newspaper. “That the Army was paralyzed with apprehension for the past two years over publishing it leaves me disappointed with the institution to which I dedicated my adult life.”

On Thursday, Rep. Jackie Speier, D-Calif., and Rep. Ruben Gallego, D-Ariz., urged Army leaders to release the history.

“We believe the report will contribute immensely to ensuring that we learn from past mistakes and that we build a future Army that is cognizant of its history and prepared for conflict,” they said in a letter to Army Chief of Staff Gen. Mark Milley and Army Secretary Mark Esper.

ADVERTISEMENT

“Our military, Congress and the American people deserve nothing less than total transparency on the lessons learned that the Army has identified.”

When the Journal last week asked Milley about the Army’s handling of the study, he replied he hoped to publish it by the end of the year.

The invasion of Iraq in March and April 2003 led by the U.S., British and coalition troops defeated Saddam Hussein’s army and paramilitary forces, while suffering less than 200 combat deaths. But soon after those hostilities ended, a sectarian civil war broke out, which evolved into full-scale guerrilla warfare against the occupying troops. In 2007, the Pentagon carried out a surge of more than 20,000 U.S. troops that helped stabilize the situation and eventually led to the withdrawal of U.S. forces in 2011.

The study praised the 2007 troop surge. It also concluded, according to the Journal, that the war effort never had enough troops; failed to develop a strategy to deter Iranian and Syrian support to insurgents; under-resourced the effort to train and equip Iraqi forces; never developed effective detainee procedures; and errantly consolidated U.S. forces on large bases, causing a security vacuum around Baghdad.

———

© 2018 the Stars and Stripes

Distributed by Tribune Content Agency, LLC.

ADVERTISEMENT
696 Shares