Man Gets 28 Years In Prison For $100M Navy Vet Charity Scam
67-year-old Bobby Thompson has been sentenced to 28 years in prison and fined $6 million for creating a nationwide scam that brought in $100 million.
If you have tips you want American Military News to investigate please email [email protected]. Your identity will be protected.
His crimes have not only hurt vets which were supposed to be helped but he also hurt the good charities that are trying to give back.
It’s stunning to me that someone can get away with such a scam for so long and it’s good to see him behind bars.
CLEVELAND – A judge handed down a 28-year prison sentence Monday to a man convicted of masterminding a $100 million, cross-country Navy veterans charity fraud.
Judge Steven Gall also ordered the defendant, who identifies himself as 67-year-old Bobby Thompson, to pay a $6 million fine. Authorities say the defendant is Harvard-trained attorney John Donald Cody.
The Ohio attorney general’s office, which handled his trial, asked the judge in a filing last week to sentence him to 41 years in prison.
The judge rejected a request for a new trial. The defense had said comments by jurors after the verdict that they were disappointed he hadn’t testified showed they were biased against him.
The defendant, whose appearance in court Monday was neat in contrast to the final days of his trial, slumped in his chair as the sentence was read. He complained to the judge about alleged abusive treatment by jailers while locked up during the trial.
There was no immediate response from the sheriff’s department. Jailers said earlier that the defendant had acted erratically and had bloodied his forehead smashing it against a holding cell wall.
The judge said the crimes had harmed veterans who were the intended beneficiaries of the donations and also had hurt other charities as donors became skeptical of giving.
“Everyone’s afraid to give,” Gall said.
He said the sentence reflected the length, extent and amount of the charity “charade.”
Defense attorney Joseph Patituce said after the verdict and again after the sentencing that ineffective legal representation issues stemming from limited preparation time might be a basis for an appeal.